You can now kiss human of interest
and fuck happily ever afterღ
Category: Uncategorized
Sterek au: Communicating across the room
Kids who grew up with those room+bathroom combinations don’t know how good they had it
I have an entire floor to myself
And then there’s this asshole
I see no downside here. On fridays, we wear dicks.
I’d say yes.
fuck yeah dick fridays
I officially take back everything I ever said about completely hating all sports
i would play the shit out of this
the guy on the floor trying to get up
romance when it comes to my otp’s: aWWWWWWW BABIES. IM SO WEA K
romance in real life: ew
all bugs can be organized into one of three categories: homies, chillers, and haters. hornets and wasps are haters. mosquitos are haters. most spiders are homies cuz they eat shitty bugs, some spiders are chillers cuz they dont really do anything, but also some spiders are haters because they’ll kill you. learn to tell the difference. bees are homies but they become haters if you fuck with them. most beetles are chillers but if they’re the kind of beetle that flies really fast at your face then they’re haters.
No for real in 2k15
Can fandom bring back the concept of a squick
A “squick” was a trope or topic that made the reader deeply uncomfortable, even might cause anxiety or intense emotional reactions
Everyone’s squicks were personal and diverse, and it was considered polite to say, “sorry I can’t read this because it squicks me, but you have fun in your corner doing what you doing”
Can we bring that back and reserve “trigger” for MI people who mean “if I see this I will have flashbacks and dissociate for hours”
I wasn’t aware this concept had fallen out of fandom. Seriously, bring it back, it’s useful as hell.
Key to the concept of “squick,” as it was first explained to me lo these many years ago, is that it is not a value judgment. If I say “mpreg is gross,” that’s a negative statement about mpreg (and, by extension, about those who enjoy writing or reading about it). If I say “mpreg squicks me,” that’s a value-neutral statement about me and my emotional reactions and how they affect my enjoyment of fiction.
And, as OP says, it does not carry the implications of intensity or trauma that “trigger” does. (Although I will point out that a trigger doesn’t have to cause flashbacks or dissociation. There are people a lot better qualified than I am to talk about that.)
Yes, yes, yes please to all of this!
squick: Something that makes you go “ewwww” and wish you had never seen/read it. Something that makes you deeply uncomfortable. Something you’re not interested in reading/seeing/thinking about, ever.
trigger: Something that you associate with/reminds you of a past trauma (mental, emotional, or physical) and therefore triggers your personal reaction to trauma (be it flashbacks, panic/anxiety attacks, unhealthy behaviours, a crying jag, whatever).
Please, please, please don’t use them interchangeably.
Yes. I think that here, as part of Tumblr culture, the conversation on triggers is advanced enough to make this distinction. Also, I never understood why Squick went out of style because it’s an amazing word that does a marvelous job of intuitively communicating meaning.
how is david duchovny still being casted when he should be kept somewhere cold dry & out of direct sunlight
straight people on tv show: *literally have sex*
*silence*
gay people on tv show: *exist*
ok.. : but… ok like im not homophobic… : im ok with gay people but why do you have to shove it in my face… :